Patent-Pending Technology

AI Hiring Decisions That Survive Audit

The only recruiting platform with adversarial verification. Structured evidence that proves your AI isn't discriminating. Not explanations. Evidence.

Request Early Access

The Compliance Gap

When EEOC Asks Why, What Do You Show Them?

Every AI hiring tool claims "explainable decisions" and "auditable AI." Here's what doesn't survive regulatory scrutiny:

"The AI explained it was a skills gap."

The explanation itself is unverifiable. It's a post-hoc rationalization, not actual reasoning.

"Our bias audit passed the four-fifths rule."

Aggregate statistics don't explain individual decisions. Regulators ask about Candidate X.

"A human made the final call."

If AI screened candidates before humans saw them, courts call that gatekeeping, not oversight.

"Our vendor certified compliance."

EEOC explicitly states vendor assurances don't shield employers from liability.

The Solution

Adversarial Verification. Not Explainability Theater.

What if AI hiring decisions had to prove they weren't screening out qualified candidates based on age, race, disability, or any other protected factor?

Not with explanations generated after the fact. With structured evidence created at decision time.

VARI™

Verification through Adversarial Review and Interrogation

A fundamentally different architecture. Every candidate evaluation is stress-tested through opposing analytical processes before a conclusion is reached. The result isn't an explanation. It's a complete adversarial record.

The Audit Trail Includes:

What case was made for the candidate

What concerns were raised against

How competing assessments were weighed against role requirements

Why the final determination was reached

Not "trust us." The trial transcript.

Defensible By Design

Why SyntraOS

Patent-Protected

VARI™ adversarial verification methodology is protected under USPTO Provisional Patent 63/931,683. This isn't a feature competitors can toggle on.

30 Years in Recruiting

We've seen every generation of hiring technology promise to solve bias. We built what actually survives scrutiny.

Production-Ready

Not a research prototype. Deployed infrastructure with enterprise-grade architecture ready for scale.

The Regulatory Landscape

The Audit Question Is Coming

40+

States with AI hiring bills introduced

2025

Workday class action certified

$365K

EEOC's first AI hiring settlement

The question isn't whether your AI hiring tools will face regulatory scrutiny. It's whether you have a defensible answer when they do.